Attachment Style Methodology

Research-backed assessment of attachment patterns based on Bowlby, Ainsworth, and modern attachment science

Why Attachment Matters

Your attachment style—formed in your first 2 years of life—profoundly affects your adult relationships, emotional regulation, conflict patterns, and even physical health. Secure attachment predicts better mental health, longer relationships, and greater life satisfaction. Insecure attachment (anxious or avoidant) correlates with anxiety, depression, and relationship struggles.

The good news? Attachment is NOT fixed. Research shows "earned secure attachment" is possible through therapy, healthy relationships, and self-awareness. Our assessment is the first step toward understanding and healing your attachment wounds.

Key Researchers & Frameworks

Dr. John Bowlby

Attachment Theory (1969)

Founded attachment theory showing how early bonding patterns with caregivers shape lifelong relationship templates. Our entire assessment framework is built on his foundational work.

Dr. Mary Ainsworth

Strange Situation Experiments

Identified three attachment styles (secure, anxious-ambivalent, avoidant) through groundbreaking research observing infant-caregiver interactions. We use her classification system.

Dr. Mary Main

Adult Attachment Interview (AAI)

Extended attachment research to adults and discovered disorganized/fearful-avoidant attachment. Our questions evaluate adult attachment narratives and coherence.

Dr. Phillip Shaver & Dr. Cindy Hazan

Adult Romantic Attachment

Applied attachment theory to romantic relationships, creating anxiety and avoidance dimensions we use to measure your attachment patterns.

Dr. Kim Bartholomew

Four-Category Model

Refined attachment into four styles: Secure, Preoccupied (anxious), Dismissing (avoidant), Fearful-Avoidant (disorganized). Our scoring uses this validated model.

Dr. Daniel Siegel

Interpersonal Neurobiology

Shows how attachment patterns are encoded in neural pathways and can be healed through new relational experiences. Informs our repair recommendations.

Assessment Dimensions

Secure Attachment

Comfortable with intimacy and independence. Trusts others, communicates needs clearly, handles conflict well.

Anxious (Preoccupied) Attachment

Craves closeness, fears abandonment. Hyper-vigilant to relationship threats, protests separation, needs constant reassurance.

Avoidant (Dismissing) Attachment

Values independence over intimacy. Uncomfortable with emotional closeness, withdraws when stressed, self-reliant to a fault.

Fearful-Avoidant (Disorganized)

Wants intimacy but fears it. Contradictory behavior (approach-avoidance), often stems from trauma or inconsistent caregiving.

What We Measure

✓ Anxiety Dimension

Fear of abandonment, need for reassurance, hypervigilance to rejection, protest behaviors

✓ Avoidance Dimension

Discomfort with intimacy, emotional distance, self-reliance, withdrawal patterns

✓ Secure Base Behavior

Ability to use partner as safe haven, comfort-seeking, proximity maintenance

✓ Reflective Function

Capacity to understand your own and others' mental states, mentalization ability

Ready to Take This Assessment?

Receive a comprehensive, research-backed evaluation with personalized recommendations.

View All Assessments